Isn’t it amazing how a weak case is first made for a deity, and then fantastically self-contradictory bridges are built around that case to their deity of choice? All the while keeping the paradox of their “unchanging” deity causing spectacular change at a finite moment, unresolved.
As was said earlier, it’s theology of the fringes, and with that, we’re full-circle back to where this whole debate began.
I just want to know what was God doing when he wasn't creating. I doubt I will get an answer.