Borhs model of the atom could be completely off base and be replaced by a model that is the exact opposite, IF that model led to better predictability.
Which would not be saying Borhs model was “wrong” or “useless”; it was more correct than anything that had gone before and great practical use was made of it.
What Can the Bohr−Sommerfeld Model Show Students of Chemistry in the 21st Century?Arnold Sommerfield, born 1868, the model-designer who improved on the Bohr Model, also wrote what is considered the classic work on Optics. It is called Optics.
Mansoor Niaz, Epistemology of Science Group, Departamento de Qumica, Universidad de OrienteAbstract: Bohrs model of the atom is considered to be important by general chemistry textbooks. A shortcoming of this model was that it could not explain the spectra of atoms containing more than one electron. To increase the explanatory power of the model, Sommerfeld hypothesized the existence of elliptical orbits. This study aims to elaborate a framework based on history and philosophy of science and formulate suggestions for facilitating students understanding of models in chemistry. Four educational implications emerged: (i) Sommerfelds innovation introducing elliptical orbits helped to restore the viability of Bohrs model; (ii) Bohr−Sommerfelds model went no further than the alkali metals, which led scientists to look for other models; (iii) scientific models are tentative in nature; and (iv) inclusion of the Bohr−Sommerfeld model in textbooks can help students understand how science [aka intelligent design of representational models] progresses.
In his wisdom he saw atoms and his intelligently designed models allowed others to see atoms as well. Optics.
Here's looking at you, kid!
Exactly. One has to realize that just because we now know that the Ptolemaic navigational system was based on geocentric universal model it does not mean it doesn't work! It still works. The efficacy of a working model does not depend on, nor explain how the world really is