[MHGinTN]

You used the term in a temporal sense trying to juxtapose the universe with ‘eteranally existing dimensions time and space, as if these come ‘before’ (a temporal term) the god you wish to disabuse as creator of time and space. You are clever, but not as clever as you presume to be. Again, you assume the assertion that god is not eternal, then assume that space and time are eternal, then you try to draw a conclusion that god cannot create ex nihilo because soemthing must pre-exist the creation of this universe. Your whirling dervish act is amusing, but rather transparent. Have a nice day

[kosta50]

You are clever, but not as clever as you presume to be.

The only presumption is you presuming that I am presuming to be clever (that's mind-reading). I write the way I see things.

Again, you assume the assertion that god is not eternal, then assume that space and time are eternal

No, I asked why should I assume that A is eternal, but B and C are not? I am not the one who insists than anything is eternal. I am simply asking why A can be eternal, but B and C can not.

then you try to draw a conclusion that god cannot create ex nihilo because soemthing must pre-exist the creation of this universe

I never said such a thing.

Your whirling dervish act is amusing, but rather transparent.

I suppose when arguments run out, insults and mind-reading come in handy.