To: LomanBill
To be specific, that is primarily higher potential energy, (due to height and gravity) -- right?
322 posted on
01/17/2011 10:02:41 PM PST by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
To: TXnMA
[To be specific, that is primarily higher potential energy, (due to height and gravity) — right? ]
Correct.
323 posted on
01/17/2011 10:05:36 PM PST by
LomanBill
(Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
To: TXnMA
Off topic, but...
Potential energy strikes me as a different kind of scientific attribute.
The snow that has higher potential energy has no measurable quantity any different from snow with less. I believe it is correct to say that potential energy is impossible to detect with the senses or their extensions.
327 posted on
01/17/2011 10:12:23 PM PST by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson