I want you to forget about particulars and variations of particulars.
Think in the abstract.
I guess the problem is that I didn’t include the word “necessarily.” If you understand logical debate, you’ll know I’ve proven my case:
A lesser mind does not necessarily require full access to the contents of a greater mind in order to know the truth of the greater mind’s judgment
Self-flattery will get you nowhere. You started of with a concrete oxymoron that a five-year old knows right from wrong, then you moved to children knowing the truth of their parents' judgment, and now you are in complete abstract sweeping generalization, that lesser minds (whose, flatworm's?!?) "know" the truth of the greater mind's judgment without having full access to the greater mind's juidgment.
How do they "know" that? A hunch? Do you think that Goebbels's children knew their father was a master of lies? Or did they see in him a loving father they could trust?