LOL, I simply asked a few questions (which you didn't answer). So, how do you know — unless you can judge God's will — that my argument doesn't hold? You can't judge my argument a failure without elaboration. And if you are thinking of copying and pasting someone else's wisdom, please make it short or better yet, speak your mind.
And since, by your conclusion, you seem to know God's mind, why don't you answer my questions: If God doesn't want "machines" than what will you call people in heaven for all eternity (they will never sin)? If God wanted us to be perfect, why not do it right from the get go? Why all the blood and suffering and killing himself to "fix" the broken world?
Did the world get to be wicked against God's will or according to it? It seems to me that Genesis 6:6 tells us God was unpleasantly surprised (!) and angered/saddened by the wickedness of man, and that God actually regretted/repented of his creation! Is that a sovereign, all-knowing deity who is in full control? Sure doesn't sound like it to me.
You’re committing the same error, again.
Here’s the difference you seem to miss (I hope you’re not only pretending to miss it):
Your assertions are dependent on the premise that you know the entirety of God’s will. Mine are not.
You say what God has done is intrinsically contradictory. I say the seeming contradiction is reconciled by the part of God’s will that we don’t know—the part we take on faith.
Here’s an analogy: A father limits the amount of television his five year old child can watch, in the interest of the child’s mental development. He says “Someday you’ll understand.” The child doesn’t know all the facts and can’t comprehend the logic behind the father’s rules, but the child understands that there are things the father knows that he, the child, doesn’t know.
The child also knows that the father is doing the right thing, but his knowing this doesn’t depend on knowing all the facts behind it or comprehending the principles involved.