"Here’s a way to understand this: it’s not the content of the law I’m talking about, but the logic with which the law is processed."
The law of Conservation of Energy, and the Second Amendment are in plain English and are not to be processed.
You just processed the Second Amendment, right there in your post.
The substance of the law tells us that energy can neither be destroyed nor created. It doesn’t say that energy can neither be destroyed nor created, and that this has always been true infinitely into the past.
Here’s the most important point of my discussion with you: whether or not the law has always been true is a question that is separate from the substance of the law.
You just processed the Second Amendment, right there in your post.
The substance of the law tells us energy can “neither be destroyed nor created.” It doesn’t say that energy can “neither be destroyed nor created and this has always been true infinitely into the past.”
Here’s the most important point of my discussion with you: whether or not the law has always been true is a question that is separate from the substance of the law.