You are reading too much into it.
Are you arguing something similar to solipsism?
No, never.
I'm really not clear here, it seems you arguing we can't know whether anything is true?
I don't think I ever suggested that. Rather, what I said was that while we know some things, we don't know everything.
Thanks for the clarification. I'm still working on understanding what you're saying about "knowing." In your previous:
we don't know everything, and therefore can not know what truth is.
I don't think it's semantics to say to know something is to know that it is true. So, I can't reconcile the two: we can know something/we can not know what truth is.
Am I jumbling your meaning here? Would it be correct to restate your position as: We can know some things are true, but not all of what is true?