As you demonstrate, Alinsky’s version of trying to defeat the opponent by his own standards eventually becomes an exercise in self-ridicule. Alinsky should have realized that his entire book was defined as the ultimate in self-ridicule—the moment he dedicated it to the origin of destruction.
Don’t ridicule your argument this way. Relativism is not interchangeable with its opposite. (And you show your hand for all to see, with this tenacious defense of relativism.)
Relativism is nothing short of a desire to create one’s own reality, one’s own world—this is the desire to be God, and it only destroys.
Let’s examine a couple of facts: in dedicating his book to the ultimate wannabe, Alinsky establishes himself as the ultimate fool. What value is there in being a disciple of the ultimate fool?
Submission to God is acknowledgement of reality. I hope you will love God.
Whose God? Yours? My neighbor's? The "official" God? Which one?