Do you think all religion is superstition?
What would you say are your religious beliefs?
I think they are a potent mix of superstition, the Golden Rule in its original form (do not do unto others what you wouldn’t want done unto you), or altered form selectively applied, some philosophy, deistic defences applied to fog dogma and plenty of self-contradiction that reveal their fundamental flaws.
None that are scripture / prophet-based. None whose dogmatic elements have equivalents in other faiths, independently derived. None that depend on faith in other men's words to have faith in a deity - in other words, none that require me to believe the words of other men, before I am able to believe in any deity that they mention, none where a deity chooses to convey of its existence through books, prophets or scrolls instead of direct revelation. Gods don't need messengers. See the ones that violate this description, and rule them out. If any are found to be in compliance, mention them, and I'll tell you if they are, or are not what I believe in.