[kosta50]

I don't think I'm understanding the question, because all I have is: something that exists that is eternal, unchanging and uncaused.

Then how does that which is unchanging, eternal and uncaused "create" without becoming changed and temporal? And what caused it to create? The very act of creation (which requires a deliberate will) makes the creator subject to a cause (will).

[D-fendr]

Then how does that which is unchanging, eternal and uncaused "create" without becoming changed and temporal?

I used the laws of physics as an example. We're talking about something that is not in the temporal, finite, changing world. Our usual concepts are not likely to apply.

The very act of creation (which requires a deliberate will) makes the creator subject to a cause (will).

I think that's anthropomorphic and if you have a cause for the first cause, it's no longer the first cause, and the problem of why anything exists remains.

And I don't agree that the fact that creation exists requires the first cause to be caused. Still don't see the logical argument there.