Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: MarkBsnr; betty boop
You are not balancing the equation. You persist in ignoring the fraction of input that is organized to form the orderly structures that form the body, organs, cells, organelles, etc. of the creature while it is alive. Instead you act as if the effluent is totality; it is not.

As bb implied, once that active, structured organization ceases at death, entropy approaches totality.

3,367 posted on 02/09/2011 7:16:36 PM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3363 | View Replies ]


To: TXnMA
You are not balancing the equation. You persist in ignoring the fraction of input that is organized to form the orderly structures that form the body, organs, cells, organelles, etc. of the creature while it is alive. Instead you act as if the effluent is totality; it is not.

It is not an equation; it is an inequality. The decrease in entropy of a localized volume of space-time must be less than the resultant increase in entropy of the rest of the universe.

While I admit that the localized observation may see decreased entropy, the increase to the rest of the universe will be greater than that decrease.

As bb implied, once that active, structured organization ceases at death, entropy approaches totality.

Negative. The results of death are stable particles, plus resultant energies (heat, etc.). In order to achieve the maximum entropy for that death, all matter has to be transformed into random energies.

3,368 posted on 02/09/2011 7:23:08 PM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3367 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson