[metmom]

I was already coming to the reluctant conclusion that most of the RCC pontificators on FR were dreadfully ignorant of their own church; of reality; of history and of Scripture . . . and tend to therefore write far more out of their on extremely narrow biases, tunnel vision, pseudo-Mary-aura'd-farcical-fantasies and the like.

What appears to be the case is that they are writing more out of what they want the church to be (the ideal RCC) than what it actually, in reality, is.

Sure, *No REAL Catholic would support _____* or *No REAL Catholic would believe/teach/do _______*, but the world is filled with Catholics who the FRoman Catholics like to include in their head count as representing Catholicism when it comes to *proving* how big they are, but who they then turn around and deny are *real* Catholics when those same Catholics are exposed to be flaming liberals.

The hypocrisy abounds.

[Quix]

What appears to be the case is that they are writing more out of what they want the church to be (the ideal RCC) than what it actually, in reality, is.

Sure, *No REAL Catholic would support _____* or *No REAL Catholic would believe/teach/do _______*, but the world is filled with Catholics who the FRoman Catholics like to include in their head count as representing Catholicism when it comes to *proving* how big they are, but who they then turn around and deny are *real* Catholics when those same Catholics are exposed to be flaming liberals.

The hypocrisy abounds.

==========================================

ABSOLUTELY, INDEED. THX.