“Asked and answered,” as the lawyers say . . . over and over and over.
Quix, if you want to throw in your lot with the Nestorians, feel free!
2. My convictions have always been that Christ, in His earthly trek, was fully God and fully man. Your accusation--however par-for-the-course off the wall--is brazenly wrong, false, erroneous, untrue.
3. Regardless of Christ merging His humanness and God-ness into one form on earth . . . it remains true that Mary could only offer her humanness. She did NOT carry and did NOT birth from her essence His God-ness.
4. Mary was a blessed Courier.
5. Mary was not, per se, legally, existentially, factually, actively sinless. She was obviously typically too much of a "Jewish Mother," to be sinless.
6. Mary had other blood children as Scripture makes plainly clear. Weasel worded rationalizations otherwise are:
--not honest to the Biblical facts,
--not scholarly,
--not historical,
--not accurate,
--not Biblical,
--not honorable,
--not logical,
--not culturally congruent with the historical record,
--not Christian--
REGARDLESS of the mental gymnastics and contortions designed to pretend and fantasize otherwise.
5. It is not plausible that one can build even a healthy, much less factual, Biblical dogma on such brazen, idolatrous, blasphemous falsehoods, deceptions, fantasies from hell. Leading folks down the yellow brick road of deception with such horrors cannot produce Biblically honorable prized fruit.
6. Poisonous foundations, poisonous trees yield poisonous fruit. What an insult to the authentic Mary for the Vatican AIWSOTARM to abuse her name that way!
RC's will not be answering, per se, to Proddys regarding such poisonous fantasies and fruit. They will be answering to God. Mary herself may provide testimony for the Prosecution.
Let's see...The Nestorians, or the Catholics...Hmmm...
Easy...Nestorians, hands down...