To: armydoc
Interesting logic, I guess this means Jesus sinned then right? For is he not part of “All”?
62 posted on
12/05/2010 6:57:35 PM PST by
jafojeffsurf
( Return to the Constitution.)
To: jafojeffsurf
Um, Jesus is the “glory of God” part.
75 posted on
12/05/2010 7:02:32 PM PST by
Politicalmom
(America-The Land of the Sheep, the Home of the Caved.)
To: jafojeffsurf
Interesting logic, I guess this means Jesus sinned then right? For is he not part of “All”?
Paul didn't think it necessary to point out the exception of Jesus in this Romans passage. Probably had something to do with the multiplicity of other passages that explicitly claimed Jesus' sinlessness. It would be redundant. However, if Mary was indeed sinless, it would have been very logical to claim her as an exception here, as there are no explicit (or even valid implicit) claims to her sinlessness elsewhere in scripture.
79 posted on
12/05/2010 7:03:40 PM PST by
armydoc
To: jafojeffsurf
He existed before “all” that He created.
To: jafojeffsurf
The sin nature passed through man, the seed. Jesus Father was God himself.
89 posted on
12/05/2010 7:06:03 PM PST by
mountn man
(The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
To: jafojeffsurf; armydoc
Interesting logic, I guess this means Jesus sinned then right? For is he not part of “All”? Jesus IS God. Mary is not God.
Also - 2 Corintians 5:21 - God made Him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in Him we might become the righteousness of God.
Let me know if the passage confuses you. I'd be happy to explain that "Trinity thingy."
110 posted on
12/05/2010 7:13:42 PM PST by
Grizzled Bear
("Does not play well with others.")
To: jafojeffsurf; armydoc
Interesting logic, I guess this means Jesus sinned then right? For is he not part of “All”? Just wow....
Do Catholics really believe that Jesus sinned now?
119 posted on
12/05/2010 7:17:10 PM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson