Who are you talking to?
She’s not even wrong, just different and yet here you are telling her that she is and castigating her for it.
Isn't that what the article that started this thread does towards Catholic belief?
Is that what Catholicism teaches? To harangue people who do something different?
The same could be said about all the threads on here criticizing Catholic belief.
Between this and other attacks on RNmom (like definitions of words), Catholics really demonstrate how to make a mountain out of a mole hill.
It wasn't any of the identified Catholics who first corrected her about the abbreviation of James, but geologist.
I don't understand why you're trying to make this about RnMomof7. She has enough experience on the Religion Forum to know that her article would stir up debate, particularly since she posted it three days before the day that Catholics celebrate Mary's Immaculate Conception, the very Catholic doctrine that the article she posted is criticizing.
You for one.
So someone post Jam instead of Jas.
BIG DEAL............
Is that all Catholics can go after someone about? Something like abbreviations and definitions?
What a red herring.
Yes, I wrote ‘the abbreviation is Jas. in the KJV, rather than JAM,’. That was all ... no put down.
A matter of fact. My reason for doing so was the semi ugly tone of the poster replying to a post how she/he should buy a Bible and then they would know JAM was for James. I for one did not. JAS. is the abbreviation I have seen for my lifetime. I am not Catholic nor do I have a Catholic Bible.
On a Christian thread it seems unchristian to have the tone that many of these responses have today..MOO
Be nice.