And you don’t place your own spin on what you present? Though I will commend you for not being blatant.
If the Pope in 382 says “this is the canon”, well, it sounds to me like he’s listing the canon. The deuterocanonical books were in lists I quoted. There might have been disagreements, but they were there.
I wish I had more time to do your posts justice, but I have to work for a living!
As is typical of most RCAs, you continue to show your commitment to Rome by continuing to assert refuted arguments, here it the being that 382 settled the canon, even though the historical value of the document it depends upon is highly suspect, as i showed you, while i also showed you that it was not exactly the same as Trent’s, which it must be if the canon was authoritatively settled in 382, and it is only of Divinely inspired writings.
I wish I had more time to do your posts justice, but I have to work for a living!
And since you could not your efforts only made a negative contention for Rome. Other have had more time and could not establish an infallible or an identical canon from 382, or that dissent did not continue right into Trent. Thus many often resort to name calling and misrepresentation as a substitute for an argument I also think many of them wish they could regain Rome’s unScriptural secular power and her sanctioned Inquisitions.
As for life and labor, i have both by the grace of God, and hope it all counts for him.
1Jn. 4:9: In this was manifested the love of God toward us, because that God sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through him.
Gal. 4:11: I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain.