The statement is Biblically founded. If you’re unfamiliar, familiarize yourself. If you reject it, understand what you’re rejecting above and beyond social niceties.
You’ve had difficulty with Biblical understanding on this forum before. My first exchange with you involved your replying that Jesus Christ being the second Adam was some strange Protestant heresy.
Why are you replying for RnMomof7? If she has a problem, let her discuss it. I have no idea why you are bringing up some other old thread, either. What does that have to do with this?