[Buggman]

Hopefully they did not also join John Hagee in rejecting Jesus' coming as Christ and Messiah.

Better than embracing your slander against Hagee. His actual point, which he had to make more clear in the second printing of the book in question since some people seem incapable of handling a bit of hyperbole, was that Yeshua's intent in the First Coming was not to be the Annointed (Mashiach, Christos) King, but to bear Israel's sins as a sacrifice.

Which is true.

May I suggest that you actually read the quote in context before getting incensed about it next time.

Shalom.

[Quix]

Now now.

If . . . Rabid clique types could not distort Scripture, reality and history

all out of whack to fit their twisted notions,

they might not have a reason to get up in the morning!

/s

[mas cerveza por favor]

Better than embracing your slander against Hagee. His actual point, [...] was that Yeshua's intent in the First Coming was not to be the Annointed (Mashiach, Christos) King, but to bear Israel's sins as a sacrifice.

Thank you for making one of my points. Hagee preaches that Jesus did not yet come as Christ. Logically then, Hagee and his followers should not continue to call themselves Christians. Agreed?