Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: mas cerveza por favor; Nosterrex

***The Epistle of James should not be listed with the canonical books of the New Testament.***

The answer is simple.

Paul was writing to the Gentile believers as he was the Apostlt to the Gentiles.

James was writing “To the twelve tribes scattered abroad”. As on can see at the Jerusalem meeting between James and Paul, James still wanted the Jewish believers to keep the LAW of MOSES while Paul’s Gentile believers were free from that LAW.

You can’t mix Law and Grace. You can’t mix James and Paul.


37 posted on 11/06/2010 7:27:18 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (I visited GEN TOMMY FRANKS Military Museum in HOBART, OKLAHOMA! Well worth it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
So, you mean (a) James isn't really inspired Scripture; or (b) the Holy Spirit can't make up his mind, and gives one set of rules to Paul (for the Gentiles) and a different set to James (for Jewish converts) -- although a big part of Romans is devoted precisely to teaching that Gentiles and Jews are saved on exactly the same basic, so that can't really be right, either.

When 2 Tm 3:16 says, All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work., does that include the Epistle of James?

38 posted on 11/06/2010 8:10:43 PM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson