To: lightman; rhema
Ullestad said since the leadership intentionally violated the church constitution, they also put the church at legal risk. The violations affect the churchs Articles of Incorporation which, in turn, affects its 501c, or non-profit, tax status.
So much for respecting
their bound conscience.
2 posted on
11/06/2010 12:02:39 AM PDT by
SmithL
To: SmithL
The violations affect the churchs Articles of Incorporation which, in turn, affects its 501c, or non-profit, tax status. That's complete BS as churches are automatically 501 c(3) tax exempt without IRS approval. The only way the IRS can challenge the tax exempt status of a church is to prove that they are not a church. The IRS couldn't even do that with Scientology...
To: SmithL; lightman
So much for respecting their bound conscience. Maybe you hadn't read the ELCAspeak codicil appended to the bound-conscience provision: "In the new Egregiously Laodicean Church in America, we will all respect each other's bound consciences . . . unless, of course, your Bible-honoring bound conscience diverges from our world-appeasing bound conscience."
4 posted on
11/06/2010 7:10:21 AM PDT by
rhema
("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
To: SmithL
So then they would have less money to send to the synod right? That'll learn 'em.
affects its 501c, or non-profit, tax status.
8 posted on
11/06/2010 7:54:01 AM PDT by
DManA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson