[greyfoxx39]

It is not unusual for Catholics or Protestants to point out lethal persecutions and it would not be "making it personal" to accuse a group of murder, burning villages, etc. Likewise it would not be "making it personal" to point out Mormon v anti-Mormon violence (e.g. Nauvoo, Mountain Meadows) - or condemn a group of murder, etc.

If the RF rules are flexible enough to include "tinkering with a name", IMO they should be flexible enough to include the smearing of a group of present-day FReepers

I don't see your response to this post

But JR DID respond

I guess he saw it a little more inflammatory than someone being called "Stormy".

Recently this kind of "impersonal" garbage has been posted in the RF several times. There IS a difference between naming a church or government "arsonists or murderers" and naming a group of FReepers as such.

My advice to the Inmans is to ignore the thin-skinned poster altogether, even when he [makes it personal].

[aMorePerfectUnion]

I assume that when you refer to the “thin-skinned poster”,
you mean:

S_OUR— ?

[I’m thinking tinkering with initials is OK...]

[Religion Moderator]

That thread was not posted on the Religion Forum.