Scriptural discernment tells Protestants and apparently most Roman Catholics that the sin nature is passed from Adam to his children, and thus from the father to his off spring.
You’ve been given Scripture and your own catechism.
Now show us where Scripture, your catechism or anyone but you says man’s sin nature comes from the mother.
You’re quick with the questions, Mark, but so far, you’re void of answers. If you’re so certain we’re wrong, you must have some evidence to back-up your claims. Where is it?
Mark is also quick to tell us we’re wrong, but not so quick to demonstrate that he is right.
He demands Scriptural support, and yet in true Catholic fashion, when it is provided, it is dismissed off hand with NOTHING to back up their contentions.
They reject our Scriptural support and offer nothing in return.
This whole issue of the sin nature coming through the mother is nothing more than a bid to lay claim to the involvement of Mary in the process of salvation beyond dispute. We’ve seen it before. The Catholic church has tried it before in its deliberate mistranslation of the Hebrew in Genesis3:15. Anything to shoehorn in on God’s plan for mankind and rob the glory from Christ and God.
It’s really pathetic the unscriptural nonsense invoked to support their worship of Mary.
ANYTHING but Christ alone.
You’ve been given Scripture...
Which does not say what you tell me it says.
...and your own catechism.
Why is an anti Catholic using the Catechism to prove their own faith and not relying on Scripture.
Now show us where Scripture, your catechism or anyone but you says man’s sin nature comes from the mother.
It doesn't say that it comes specifically from either. You made the claim, you prove it.
You’re quick with the questions, Mark, but so far, you’re void of answers. If you’re so certain we’re wrong, you must have some evidence to back-up your claims. Where is it?
I am not the one claiming anything - you are. You are a sola believer - well, prove it with sola.