To: kosta50; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; Belteshazzar; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; ...
Oh I have more proof than you do, because I deal only with what all can see and read. No you don't because by restricting it like that you are eliminating a whole body of evidence. Not very objective of you to both do that and not apparently not see that you are not being objective.
I don't offer fantastic tales and denigrate others for not believing them.
5,219 posted on
12/12/2010 3:05:40 PM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; Belteshazzar; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww
No you don't because by restricting it like that you are eliminating a whole body of evidence. Not very objective of you to both do that and not apparently not see that you are not being objective.So, then, in your book, being "objective" is to be subjective? How objective if you!
5,258 posted on
12/13/2010 4:48:56 AM PST by
kosta50
(God is tired of repenting -- Jeremiah 15:6, KJV)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson