[metmom]

Why do you believe the words of an ordinary man? What proof do you have that he is telling the truth?

Everybody is an *ordinary man* then and there's no reason that we should believe anyone, even you.

You have no proof that you're telling the truth either.

By your own criteria, your ramblings are just as much vanity as anyone else's and thus deserve the credence that such nothingness warrants.

[kosta50]

Everybody is an *ordinary man* then and there's no reason that we should believe anyone, even you

You don't have to believe me. I never demanded that you do. But you are avoiding my question.

You have no proof that you're telling the truth either

Oh I have more proof than you do, because I deal only with what all can see and read.

By your own criteria, your ramblings are just as much vanity as anyone else's and thus deserve the credence that such nothingness warrants.

My criteria are things humans can see and detect. Everything else is speculation. There is no vanity in what I say. I don't offer fantastic tales and denigrate others for not believing them. On the other hand, you call real things "nothingness" and fantastic things real.

And all this because you refuse to answer a simple question about Paul.