[kosta50]

For a short time, he existed but you still have to believe someone else. You are taking their word for it

They are not anonymous, single source writers describing "supernatural" events. In other words, there is substantially more evidence to accept that Luther did exist, if not all aspects of his life. In other words is not legendary by any stretch.

And GOD ALWAYS WAS

How do you know that?

and you speak about HIS Word

How do you know that too?

and yet you are lost and question the One whose Words you post. WEIRD!!

No I simply post the words I find in the Bible.

[metmom]

They are not anonymous, single source writers describing "supernatural" events. In other words, there is substantially more evidence to accept that Luther did exist, if not all aspects of his life. In other words is not legendary by any stretch.

Do lots of people lying together make something true?

It could be a conspiracy to make it look like Luther existed so the Catholic church would have someone to blame it on when it started coming apart at the seams. You know, like how the NY was written?

[presently no screen name]

And GOD ALWAYS WAS......How do you know that?

Why don't YOU know that?

No I simply post the words I find in the Bible.

That's ALL you are capable of doing. But you don't stop there; you, pridefully, voice your 'opinion' on God's Word. And your opinion IS VOID of Truth because God's Word is Spiritually discerned and you empty of spiritual discernment.

You've been told that repeatedly and you ignore it because God's Word is nothing to you in spite of the fact you will be judged on it. Whether you believe it or not - is of no consequence to anyone but yourself.

[metmom]

No I simply post the words I find in the Bible.

That's not true either. Your posts are continually filled with assertions contesting the validity of Scripture.

It's interesting that for some people the only time anything in Scripture has any validity is as a bludgeon against the very thing they reject.