[wmfights]

Kosta has already told us hundreds of times that any part of the word of God that he disagrees with is a lie.

In fairness to our FRiend Kosta I think his position is that whenever a group of theologians from his church gathered and determined what the truth of something was that is what the truth is. Any disagreement with these theologians would be wrong. If a clear reading of Scripture disagrees with the determination of these theologians then Scripture as interpreted would be wrong.

Therefore brothers and sisters become cousins. ;)

[kosta50]

In fairness to our FRiend Kosta I think his position is that whenever a group of theologians from his church gathered and determined what the truth of something was that is what the truth is

How is that different than agreeing whatever an a group of Protestants or individual Protestant decides it's true?

[Natural Law]

"In fairness to our FRiend Kosta I think his position is that whenever a group of theologians from his church gathered and determined what the truth of something was that is what the truth is."

Let's see, on one hand you have a group of people who seek the counsel of a consensus formed by the greatest intellectuals and spiritual leaders of the last 2,000 years arrived at by a rigorous process of study and debate. On the other hand you have the "learned" opinions of the Rev. Billy-Bob Rolex and the alumni of the East Tree Stump School of Theology and Diesel Maintenance, or worse self cogitated drivel that makes a yokel feel spiritually superiority.........Makes you go hmmmmmmm.