To: presently no screen name; Judith Anne
"Whats the problem, are you ashamed of the hatred you posted towards St. Paul? You can repent instead of making it a big deal on this thread." I recall the discussion well. As with many actual Christians it isn't what St. Paul actually wrote that is "loony", it is the bizarre Protestant interpretations and importance that has been assigned to them that invokes the ridicule.
3,851 posted on
11/30/2010 8:29:51 PM PST by
Natural Law
(lex orandi, lex credendi, lex vivendi)
To: Natural Law; presently no screen name; Judith Anne; Gamecock
I recall the discussion well. As with many actual Christians it isn't what St. Paul actually wrote that is "loony", it is the bizarre Protestant interpretations and importance that has been assigned to them that invokes the ridicule. Apparently your recall is completely flawed.
That is NOT what the conversation was about.
3,855 posted on
11/30/2010 8:44:07 PM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Natural Law
actual Christians
What's an actual Christian? LOL!
What would Catholics know about interpretation when the RCC says their sheep need to leave interpretation to them. And will spoon feed them with 'their' interpretation.
And we don't expect Catholics to understand God's Word either for it is spiritually discerned. So calling Christians interpretation bizarre is calling the Holy Spirit bizarre - Are you sure you want to go there?
IOW, saying man made teachings are bizarre would be fine for you to do.
3,857 posted on
11/30/2010 8:49:26 PM PST by
presently no screen name
("Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down.." Mark 7:13)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson