[metmom]

No, that is not a fact. I've been asking on this and every thread to give me one example. Invariably, one gives either something that is not in the scripture either way, or something where his interpretation is one in error, and the context and plain meaning bear out the correct Catholic interpretation. You can try again; till such time your statement is malicious slander, and loss of Christian faith on your part.

So, we answer your questions, support it from the Scripture that you church claims it wrote and is inerrant, and you dismiss it as invalid for a variety of reasons.

Let me ask you this, Is there ANY evidence that a non-Catholic can present you that you won't off=handedly dismiss as invalid.

I've seen this kind of debate tactic before. The only evidence that's admissible is one that supports the person's position. Anything that shows him to be wrong is disallowed.

It's a dishonest debate tactic.

[annalex]

Is there ANY evidence that a non-Catholic can present you that you won't off=handedly dismiss as invalid

Present away. If I dismiss your "evidence" that is because it is dismissible, and I point out why. If you think there is a post of mine where I dismissed evidence without a reason, please point to that post.