My apologies, got you mixed up with another poster. Truly, I am sorry.
Moving on:
Peter calls himself Peter in one letter and Simon Peter in the second and that’s a reason to suppose there are TWO different writers? Right.
A Galilean fisherman couldn’t write well? Says who? What was Peter’s writing style?
Comments on Galileans sound like the arrogant and contemptous statements of the Pharisees toward their supposed “inferiors” at John, chapter seven.
Events? What events?
I must say, I’ve read all the objections and it’s no wonder I have a low opinion of the higher critics.
Peter calls himself Peter in one letter and Simon Peter in the second and that's a reason to suppose there are TWO different writers? Right.
A Galilean fisherman couldn't write well? Says who? What was Peter's writing style?
Comments on Galileans sound like the arrogant and contemptuous statements of the Pharisees toward their supposed “inferiors” at John, chapter seven.
Events? What events?
I must say, I've read all the objections and it's no wonder I have a low opinion of the higher critics.