Most scholars agree that they are, and that they were written by two different authors. The style of writing, the Septuagint references (remember Peter was supposed to be the apostle to the Jews, so why the Greek Septuagint and why is a Jewish fisherman writing in urbane, sophisticated Greek?); the historical events described did not correspond to events during Peter's life time; writing his name differently in 1 Peter as opposed to 2 Peter, etc.
I can’t believe you fell that nonsense promoted by skeptics, atheists and other assorted pseudo-scholars! The objections to Peter’s authorship are downright laughable.
Coming from someone who says Paul spent three years in heaven with the Lord before going to Jerusalem cannot be taken seriously.
Let’s start with the most obvious:
“Coming from someone who says Paul spent three years in heaven with the Lord before going to Jerusalem cannot be taken seriously.”
When or where did I ever say anything like that or agree with it in any way, shape, whatever? Please...show me or shut up.