Being agnostic doesn't prevent anyone from pointing to an error, especially when the publishers of the first edition of KJV admitted to a couple of hundred errors.
The same kosta50 who argues against the deity of Christ?
I merely pointed to the fact that he is not portrayed as God in various parts of the NT. I document my claims. You are more than welcome to provide your documented counter-arguments—if you can that is; which remains to be seen.
You trust his discernment on spiritual matters?
SFA asked me to comment on a linguistic issue, not spiritual matters. Do you understand the difference?
Yes, you were called in for your "linguistic" knowledge, so why did you also feel the need to add your comments on the "spiritual matters"?
For example, you don't believe Isaiah 7:14 is a Messianic prophecy, you think Paul was wrong-headed about many things, you think the KJV was "manipulated" and "untrustworthy", you think the "Reformed" are wrong, etc. Can you just give a knowledgeable contribution on language without adding your "agnostic" opinions? I really do think that is what stfassisi was asking for since you "dis" his faith along with everybody elses'.