Quix wrote:
“There’s a huge amount of territory between incompetent and infallible. Then there’s all the issues about incompetent about what sorts of issues, details, historical facts? Infallible about everything Biblical? Cue horse laugh.”
Cue horse laugh, yourself. I never said infallible, but I’d wager more competent by far than either of the two “horse-laugh-cuers” now present on this thread.
It is always wise to question the motives and claims of men. But it is no virtue to deride real learning, especially when coupled with deep trust of God’s word.
I don’t recall being derisive toward YOU.
A host of RC nonsense deserves layers of derision.