Now now.
Biblical and Rational
are totally against the unspoken & unwritten Catechism of the Vatican Alice In Wonderland School of Theology and Reality Mangling.
Very much of those and the whole edifice would crumble.
It is logical that the church in Rome is not mentioned in Revelation because Holy Spirit left the building centuries before the END TIMES spoken of in Revelation—except for scattered Charismatic groups here and there.
Of course, the white-washed tomb motif . . . dressed up in White Hankys is designed to overcome such ‘technicalities’ . . . but rumor has it that God is NOT thereby impressed . . . and that if the authentic Mary focused on anything but God and teaching the aborted children the ways of God, she’d lose her Heavenly Peace to outrage at what they’ve done in her name.
It is logical that the church in Rome is not mentioned in Revelation because Holy Spirit left the building centuries before the END TIMES spoken of in Revelation—except for scattered Charismatic groups here and there.
Your end-times delusional fantasies has been proven countless times to be false. It never was logical, and asserting that it is doesn't make it so. Heck, even Rome rejects the Premillennial Dysfunctionalism you mindlessly repeat here.
Metmom has a very valid point, for the entire foundation of the RCC depends on this foolishness of the Church being centered in Rome, yet no mention of it is in the Scripture, particularly the letters written to the seven churches.
Furthermore, there are many Roman Catholics of old who consider Revelation one of the earlier texts written, not some post Fall of Jerusalem 95 AD drivel that routinely comes out of the Dysfunctionalist camp. You are arguing against your own cult, again, I see nothing logical about that.
YOU need to return to Rome and embrace her eschatology, not the lunacy of Tim LaHay and Hal Lindsey.