Posted on 10/25/2010 4:50:55 AM PDT by Colofornian
The author of the Book of Mormon makes what is purported to be a direct quote of Isaiah written in 600BC. BUT in the ‘direct quote of Isaiah’ the author of the BofM includes the name ‘Lucifer’ which is a Latin name and which didn’t make its way into the texts until perhaps the second century AD. In 600BC the Latin language didn’t even exist. So we see that the author of the Book of Morons merely quoted the King James rendering of Isaiah which came to be possibly through the translation of Hebrew by Jerome. The author of the Book of Morons lied about the source of the texts, at the very least.
I just found out that Alma was a dude. I bet he got beaten up a lot in grade school.
Um...
Hat...
Yeah, hat is what I meant to say...
And let’s not forget “adieu”...
Or maybe he was always hit up for alms?
Wist ye not?
Oh yeah! That word has even more recent origins!
Yikes more evidence of “Hardening of the Heart”
I see you brought back your old tagline.
Ooooh, you used the word “whit”.
Here’s another word whose use in the BoM, a supposed “ancient record of a “lost” tribe of Israel” can’t be explained…
Alma 42: 25 What, do ye suppose that mercy can rob justice? I say unto you, Nay; not one whit. If so, God would cease to be God. “
“...whit...”????
Origin:
1470–80; perh[aps] an alter[ation] of ME wiht
wiht origin:
From Germanic *wextiz. Cognate with Old Saxon wiht (Dutch wicht), Old High German wiht (German Wicht), Old Norse vættr (exceptional creature), vætr, véttr, or vétr (Danish vætte, Swedish vätte), Gothic (waihts).(ca. 12th c.)
[edit] Noun - wiht (plural wihtu)
creature, person, thing, being
Descendants: English: wight; whit
So here we have another example of a word used in the BoM whose origins can be traced as far back as the 12th century, but I can’t trace it back any further.
How did such a word come to be used in a book supposedly written hundreds of years earlier and never be known in another language until the Norse, Germanic and Scandinavian cultures came onto the scene?
Hmmm, I guess we’re just supposed to ignore the little man behind the curtain manning the controls?
______
From Webster 1828 whit another word for jot
Your search [word => ‘whit’ ] returned 73 results.
whit
WHIT, n. [L.] A point; a jot; the smallest part or particle imaginable. It is used without a preposition. He is not a whit the wiser for experience.
It does not me a whit displease.
The regular construction would be by a whit, or in a whit. In these phrases, a whit may be interpreted by in the least, in the smallest degree.
Your search [word => ‘jot’ ] returned 2 results.
jot
JOT, n. [ Heb. yod.] An iota; a point; a tittle; the least quantity assignable.
Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one title shall in no wise pass from the law till all shall be fulfilled. Matt.5.
A man may read much, and acquire not a jot of knowledge, or be a jot the wiser.
JOT, v.t. To set down; to make a memorandum of.
Jot or tittle
Meaning
A tiny amount.
Origin
The phrase ‘jot or tittle’ is somewhat tautological, as both jot and tittle refer to tiny quantities. It has passed into English via William Tindale’s translation of the New Testament in 1526. It appears there in Matthew 5:18:
One iott or one tytle of the lawe shall not scape.
The more familiar language of the King James Version, 1611, renders that verse as:
For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
A jot is the name of the least letter of an alphabet or the smallest part of a piece of writing. It is the Anglicized version of the Greek iota - the smallest letter of the Greek alphabet, which corresponds to the Roman ‘i’. This, in turn, was derived from the Hebrew word jod, or yodr, which is the the smallest letter of the square Hebrew alphabet. Apart from its specialist typographical meaning, we still use the word jot more generally to mean ‘a tiny amount’. Hence, when we have a brief note to make, we ‘jot it down’.
A tittle, rather appropriately for a word which sounds like a combination of tiny and little, is smaller still. It refers to a small stroke or point in writing or printing. In classical Latin this applied to any accent over a letter, but is now most commonly used as the name for the dot over the letter ‘i’. It is also the name of the dots on dice. In medieval calligraphy the tittle was written as quite large relative to the stem of the ‘i’. Since fixed typeface printing was introduced in the 15th century the tittle has been rendered smaller.
The use of the word ‘dot’ as a small written mark didn’t begin until the 18th century. We may have been told at school to dot our i’s; Chaucer and Shakespeare would have been told to tittle them.
________________________________________
For Pete’s sake Resty, you’re helping SZonian prove his point, LOL!
Pull pranks??? Me??? Never!! ;^)
Thanks, resty.
You see, if the BoM was as old as claimed, the word “jot” would probably have been more appropriate, yet even it only goes back to circa 16 A.D.
Instead, a word more commonly used during JS’s era to describe “a little” was used.
Since it’s agreed that the BoM “era” predates the NT, the use of either word in the BoM would be suspect.
Thanks again!
Thanks, resty.
You see, if the BoM was as old as claimed, the word “jot” would probably have been more appropriate, yet even it only goes back to circa 16 A.D.
Instead, a word more commonly used during JS’s era to describe “a little” was used.
Since it’s agreed that the BoM “era” predates the NT, the use of either word in the BoM would be suspect.
Thanks again!
***
It is my understanding Zman when receiving a revelation it is related to understand of the recipient.
Since it’s agreed that the BoM “era” predates the NT, the use of either word in the BoM would be suspect.
****
Even those many eras of The Book of Mormon predates it does not predate the NT when it was Mormon who;
-abridged their history onto the plates of Mormon
-He inserts the plates of Nephi into the abridgement
-King Benjamin establishes peace in the land. About A.D. 385
you consider they were hid up by Mormon’s son Moroni around 421 AD
I'm leaning toward the church of Rocky the Squirrel after seeing this on FB the other day...
"I would like to bear my testimony today, that I am not nuts, I believe this to be true with all my heart and Heavenly Squirrel has witnessed the truth of it to me. Even though sometimes I may be crazy and even surrounded by anti-squirrels, I still KNOW that I am not nuts. isaythisinthenameofrockythesquirelamen."
I am going to get busy gathering nuts and placing them where The Heavenly Squirrel wants them to be. Then when I die, I can live with HIM in the Highest Branches....and hope to gather enough to become a squirrel myself.
Incoming message from bullwinkethemoose "Hey Rocky! Watch me pull scripture out of my hat!"
LOL...That’s great, R!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.