That post was not that difficult to comprehend.
It was even inferentially evident that I undstand infallibility dogma quite well.
I understood it BEFORE FR.
Having had it drummed into our noggins relentlessly on FR by those seeking to make FR an office in the Vatican, I assure you, I have a fairly robust understanding of it—as do most frequent posting Proddys hereon.
Evidently you missed the point of my post.
An interest in accuracy would have supposedly meant that you’d have gotten the point more accurately.
So much for such assumptions.
I have no interest in . . . as the Chinese say . . . spoon feeding the duck.