So acknowledging in one sentence that the materials have been seen by us then in the very next sentence saying that we have not looked at them is not contradictory.
Well I guess I can see that as being so in "Mormon world"...
In the real one, not so much...
That does explain a lot and further supports my thoughts that you were indeed a former "anti" along with probably a list of other things..
But thanks for continuing to try and hide your mistake(s) in worthless blather and spin, it just makes it better and better...
Oh wait, you did not make a mistake using LDS standards...
I forgot.
False. I have given you all you need to research these claims.
And I have, and they are STILL FALSE, no artifacts, no ruins, no DNA...
Maybe you have more somewhere...
And I have, and they are STILL FALSE
Nope. You still disagree. Not the same thing.
I’m giving up on explaining the other bit to you. Like most everything else, trying to explain anything to a blinder wearing anti is pointless.