Replies

Well, chick, I’ve never hit the abuse button.

In fact, I’ve never played hall monitor either like some do.

Pity y’all STILL CAN’T discuss the article.

One Trick Ponies in every thread. It’s like watching a kid’s commercial on Saturday morning for sugar cereal.

I hit the abuse button whenever I feel there's good reason. It's peculiar to me this idea that people who break rules are somehow morally superior to people who catch them breaking rules. The abusive husband is somehow better than the abused wife who calls 911? How?

Pity y’all STILL CAN’T discuss the article.

They may be able to discuss the article, but they do not want to discuss the article. Protestantism depends on nominalism and sophistry, and as we have seen again and again, the principle sophistries are attacking the person, changing the subject, and petitio principii. The object is to externalize their anger and to project it, blaming it not on their own disposition but on us, the elect object of their spite.

And the main clue is that the truth had almost nothing to do with it. And the second clue is that when confronted they deny any animus toward us, despite the personal attacks and persistent falsehoods, and claim, incredibly, only to be angry at what we believe, while post after post shows they have next to no clue what we believe, and the defectors least of all.