Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee; Natural Law; Religion Moderator
Natural Law has continued to make personal remarks about me. Incessantly. Even today in his post 159 he says, "As one who purports to know everything there is to know about Catholicism you should know..."

That is mind-reading and making it personal.

When I asked him to stop doing so, he accused me of threatening him with the rules. I explained to him that his other remarks which broke the rules had been deleted and he should stop breaking the rules.

That is not carrying over the argument. That is showing Natural Law his posts had been deleted which broke the rules, something he may have been unaware of. If he had been aware those posts had been removed, then a logical conclusion would be he continued to break the rules not out of ignorance, but spite. Who knows?

198 posted on 09/21/2010 12:36:26 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Eckleburg; Natural Law; Religion Moderator

Hey, all I was asking is if it’s now acceptable to bring up posts from other threads that were pulled. I’ve got links to some great ones.


204 posted on 09/21/2010 12:41:42 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
"That is mind-reading and making it personal."

Had I stated that you do or don't know something would be mind reading. Commenting on what you should know is an expression of my opinion. Stop discussing me and start discussing the issues or get off the thread.

205 posted on 09/21/2010 12:41:42 PM PDT by Natural Law (A lie is a known untruth expressed as truth. A liar is the one who tells it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; Natural Law; Religion Moderator; count-your-change; RnMomof7
When I asked him to stop doing so, he accused me of threatening him with the rules. I explained to him that his other remarks which broke the rules had been deleted and he should stop breaking the rules.

Considering the potty language NL used in post 165, why am I not surprised?

Nevertheless, unless you are a mod, there is no way that any FReeper could *threaten* another with the rules. No FReeper who is not a mod has no power to enforce the rules. The best any can do is point out flagrant, or not so flagrant, violations, and leave it to the RM to deal with.

218 posted on 09/21/2010 1:01:45 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson