Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exploring universal Christian beliefs (LDS)
http://www.mormontimes.com ^ | 09/03/2010 | Dan Peterson

Posted on 09/03/2010 5:27:36 AM PDT by Paragon Defender

Glenn Beck has been in the news lately and, not surprisingly, so has his religion. Some have warned Christians to be wary of Beck, not because of his political views but because of his religious affiliation. He is, they say, not a real Christian.

I'm betting, though, that he is. I don't know Mr. Beck personally, but he belongs to the same church I do, and I'm a pretty mainstream member. I'll wager that his beliefs resemble mine.

I believe in God, the Father Almighty, the creator of heaven and earth. I also believe in Jesus Christ, his only-begotten Son, the Lord of all humankind, who, before being born to the Virgin Mary, was the Jehovah of the Old Testament. I believe that Jesus Christ suffered under Pontius Pilate, that he was crucified, died and was buried. While his body lay in the tomb, he descended into the realm of the spirits of the dead and preached the gospel there. On the third day, Jesus rose, physically, from death. He ascended into heaven, where he sits at the right hand of the Father. He will return, however, in power and great glory, to judge the living and the dead. In the meantime, we can receive guidance from the Holy Spirit, the third member of the Trinity.

I believe that Christ founded a church in order to teach his doctrine and administer the ordinances of salvation to all humanity and that the fellowship of the Saints, Christ's disciples, transcends not only all ethnic, cultural and national divisions but even death itself. I believe in the forgiveness of sins and the resurrection of the body, which are made possible only through the gracious Atonement of Jesus Christ, in whom we have our only hope of salvation. And, finally, I believe in everlasting life.

Some will have recognized that the structure and phrasing of the two paragraphs above were modeled, quite consciously, on the ancient "Apostles' Creed" — a text dating to roughly the late fifth century. In the modern translation favored by the Church of England, the Apostles' Creed reads as follows:

"I believe in God, the Father almighty, creator of heaven and earth. I believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord, who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried; he descended into hell. On the third day he rose again; he ascended into heaven, he is seated at the right hand of the Father, and he will come to judge the living and the dead.

"I believe in the Holy Spirit, the holy catholic Church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and the life everlasting. Amen."

Now, obviously, I've changed the language a bit. Mostly, I wanted to use more familiar or more typically Mormon terms. For instance, the word "catholic" is rarely used, nowadays, in its original sense of "universal" — it should be obvious that Henry VIII's church isn't announcing its surrender to the pope when it recites the Apostles' Creed — but Latter-day Saints do most definitely believe that the church established by Jesus has a universal mission.

More significantly, where the original Apostles' Creed says that Christ was "conceived by the Holy Spirit" ("conceptus est de Spiritu Sancto"), Latter-day Saints will want to insist that Jesus is the divine Son of God the Father. The scriptures are completely silent as to the mechanism of Christ's conception, and they do say that the Holy Spirit came upon Mary (Luke 1:35), but they also plainly declare that Jesus was and is "the Son of the Highest" (Luke 1:32). And emphasis on the fact that Jesus is the Son of God the Father scarcely seems a plausible basis for claiming that Latter-day Saints aren't Christians.

Believing what we do, because we agree so closely with the traditional Apostles' Creed, either Glenn Beck and I (and, for that matter, Mitt Romney and Harry Reid) are Christians, or those who formulated the creed and all those who have affirmed it during the centuries since then haven't been, either.


TOPICS: Other Christian; Religion & Culture; Theology
KEYWORDS: inman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,401-1,4201,421-1,4401,441-1,460 ... 1,761 next last
To: greyfoxx39
I suspected that was the root issue. Thank you so much for sharing your insights, dear brother/sister in Christ!
1,421 posted on 09/16/2010 9:54:45 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1396 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser
Whenever people start judging and speaking like they are God, I figure they might not intend to be Antichrists, so I remind them.

Yet that is in essence what you did DU.

That would kind of go against my whole theme, don't you think? I would ask if you put those answers to the test I linked to in the Bible, but that is all.

That was put to the test before you were probably born DU, you are not God, nor can you read minds. Oh and yes my copy of the bom had all those instructions too.

Many discussions ago, weren't you one of the ones arguing that Satan had answered my prayer to God? If you believe that is possible, what precautions did you take, if I may ask to make sure it was God?

Not only did I show through the Bible (not 'argue') but I also pointed out to your own church history even acknowledged that. I relied upon the Bible and the scriptures therein DU, it was good enough for Jesus it is good enough for me. What precautions did you take and how sure they were valid.

1,422 posted on 09/16/2010 9:57:19 PM PDT by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1344 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39; DelphiUser
I find interesting, because many of us who DID try the “test” were told by mormons that it was our fault when we received an answer from the Holy Spirit that the BOM was NOT true. So why would ‘Zilla (or anyone else for that matter) bother with it. I believe he previously has posted his experience, BTW.

Thanks GF, this is the heart of the matter. We did the 'test', and we receive a NO for an answer. There is no way you can prove that our experiences were any less inspired than your story. I passed mine some 40 years ago DU. If you are going to be honest to your test, you have to be honest in recognizing our answers to the negative are equally inspired of God as yours on its merits and standards.

1,423 posted on 09/16/2010 10:02:57 PM PDT by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1348 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Beautiful Scriptures! Thank you oh so very much sharing them, dear brother in Christ, and thank you for sharing your insights!
1,424 posted on 09/16/2010 10:03:11 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1345 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian
Delph There is only one Christ.

Colofornian You know this is a bit like the Obama birth certificate question. The Mormon christ's b.c. reads "Jerusalem" per the Book of Mormon; but the Bible & history has it as "Bethlehem."
(Will the real Obama and Jesus please stand up)


Surly you know that "at Jerusalem" was a common structure in 600 BC, right? it's used in other documents from the era, and since that usage died out by the time of Christ, it's actually an evidence for the Book of Mormon, not against it.

You might want to read up on some of the works oh Hugh Nibley, here's a page titled Bethlehem vs. the Land of Jerusalem: Is Alma 7:10 a Blunder?

Now the question is, are you just interested in saying inflammatory things, or will you admit it when proven wrong, or at least questionable.

Just to pile on...

The Dead Sea Scrolls & Book of Mormon - Parallels
Dark Days in Jerusalem The Lachish Letters and the Book of Mormon
The Lachish Letters: Archaeological Bullseye for the Book of Mormon And a quotation from this last "bullseye" article:
They actually match up more perfectly than anything in the Bible and outside archaeological discoveries. The Lachish Letters are nigh unto perfect for archaeological proof that Joseph Smith was *not* kidding when he said the BofM was real history.
Just information to keep you from looking foolish when your musings get answered with facts.

Delph
1,425 posted on 09/16/2010 10:47:53 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1311 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet; DelphiUser; greyfoxx39; reaganaut; ejonesie22
Surely, you can't be so blind as to not see that you are doing exactly what you accuse Godzilla and I of doing.

It is necessary in order to save face, for some to attempt to neutralize a contrary testimony in this manner. Bill Clinton was a master of this as is 0bama today. We did the test and the test came up opposite of the results DU came up with.

Contrary results invalidate the mormon claim on this test.

1,426 posted on 09/16/2010 10:48:40 PM PDT by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1369 | View Replies]

To: killermedic
Wow, that was great!

Good job!
1,427 posted on 09/16/2010 10:50:33 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1316 | View Replies]

To: svcw
created or eternal

Obviously, since Jesus was begotten, not made, that would depend on if you think begotten=created (JFTR, I don't think they are equal).

Jesus is immortal, and eternal, but he was still born here, and I don't think I want to try to explain the temporal mechanics and a being independent of time, yet interacting with time based beings like us...

Delph
1,428 posted on 09/16/2010 10:55:56 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1318 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut

Please do not presume to tell me what I know or do not know. You have not lived my life, had my experiences, know my relationship with God. You will never be privy to the sacred spiritual experiences I have had; the miracles I have witnessed. As I said before, you may opine as you wish. I know what I know. Period.


1,429 posted on 09/16/2010 10:57:27 PM PDT by rscully ("You cannot change a mind with logic that was made up without the use thereof." --DelphiUser's Dad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1405 | View Replies]

To: Normandy

Normonday...it is wise to continue on with the context of that scripture reference..

In 1 John 4:6 where Christians John encourages that we recognize the Spirit of truth and the spirit of falsehood by listening to the word of God. All must be tested by this as follows....

“We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us. This is how we recognize the Spirit of truth and the spirit of falsehood.”

This is why the Christian Community can never accept Mormons as Christian....Mormonism opposes the clear teachings of the apostles and Christ as recorded in Gods Word. We identify that Mormonism doesn’t abide by the scripture nor that which Christ and His apostles taught...that is how we know Mormonism comes from a spirit of falsehood.


1,430 posted on 09/16/2010 10:58:33 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1412 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39; Godzilla
Godzilla is away for a while, so he can answer later.

So when he's away, he gets a "pass" when we are a way, we are hiding...

LOL!

As for Godzilla's Story(s) do we really have to go into that again?

Delph
1,431 posted on 09/16/2010 11:02:35 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1348 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut; rscully

“had my experiences”....”spiritual experiences”

Reaganaut,

Much is sstated about their “experiences”...twice no less...also the “miracles” (happenings), Which again evidences ones faith in a false religion oftentimes is dependant on their experiences and happenings. Which we know the enemy of mens souls uses to keep people in darkness....and which Jesus mentions the lack of faith in those who hold to these ....”Blessed is He who believes without seeing.”

Many in the occults have spiritual experiences where they believe they are experiencing things from the spiritual world...oftentimes believing these are from God. But they have been deceived greatly. Most will not share those experiences unless with those who likewise have had the same or similar. When this happens they re-enforce these experiences.


1,432 posted on 09/16/2010 11:15:04 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1429 | View Replies]

To: caww

As I said, you are entitled to your opinions. Have a lovely evening, I know I will.


1,433 posted on 09/16/2010 11:28:57 PM PDT by rscully ("You cannot change a mind with logic that was made up without the use thereof." --DelphiUser's Dad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1432 | View Replies]

To: killermedic

The Bible teaches that Jesus was not only worshipped but also called God by Thomas in Jn.20:28..... “My Lord my God”.(Gr. The Lord of me the God of me)...... Instead of being rebuked for this statement which would be blasphemy if false, he is commended and blessed, something no true prophet would do unless it was correct.

We find the wise men worshipped Jesus as a child. Mt.2:11.....The leper worshipped Jesus Mt.8....... The ruler bowed and worshipped Mt.9:18..... .The believer who was blind worshipped him Jn.9:38...... The women worshipped him Mt. 15:25,...... Mary Magdalene worshipped him Mt.28:9, the disciples worshipped him Mt.28:17.......

.... This word for worship in Greek is ‘proskeneo’ the same word used for worship for Jehovah God and for worship of false Gods. It is rendered 16 times to Jesus as a beneficent superior;.... at least 24 times to God or to Jesus as God. “The root idea of bodily prostration is much less prominent than in the Old Testament. It is always translated “worship.” (International Standard Bible Encylopaedia)

Mt. 4:10 “When Jesus said to Satan `You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only you shall serve.’ He certainly wasn’t telling him to do reverence only. One has to be consistent in the usage of the word, you can’t pick and choose when to or not to apply it.

Jesus is either a false God receiving undue worship or that all the creatures in heaven are not worshipping Jesus. Which means, they are also not worshipping Jehovah God, because the same word is applied to both.


1,434 posted on 09/16/2010 11:41:17 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1336 | View Replies]

To: rscully

These are not my opinions but from those who have been involved in occults and have come out of them. They should ‘know’ how they were deceived, especially since they now “know” the truth.... and that what they once believed was a counterfeit.


1,435 posted on 09/16/2010 11:45:19 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1433 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian
I love these "Either my interpretation is correct, or your saying the Bible is wrong" challenges...

So, you're saying that the bible says htere will never be a falling away because of Ephesians Epnesians 3:20-21
20 Now unto him that is able to do exceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think, according to the power that worketh in us,

21 Unto him be glory in the church by Christ Jesus throughout all ages, world without end. Amen.
OHhh KAAaay

So if the Bible says through out all ages, that means there will never have been an apostasy and the church will never have been off the earth and never will...

Have you ever heard of Noah? You might want to read up on that here

SOoo... Either he Bible disproves itself, or your interpretation is wrong. I'm gonna go with your interpretation being wrong for 100 Alex!

What do Mormons say about this scripture? Well not that we discuss it much, but since we believe the Church of Jesus Christ is alive and well in heaven, and has been since before the earth was created and will still be once the world has ended, doesn't that fit the "THROUGHOUT ALL GENERATIONS, FOR EVER AND EVER!" better than there will never be and has never been interpretation? I think so.

Delph
1,436 posted on 09/16/2010 11:46:17 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1351 | View Replies]

To: rscully
*Blushes*

Thanks!

It's good to see you and good to be back!

Delph

1,437 posted on 09/16/2010 11:47:56 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1357 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

John 10:30-33 when Jesus said “I and My Father are one” (In Greek We are one). Then the Jews took up stones again to stone Him. Jesus answered them, “Many good works I have shown you from My Father. For which of those works do you stone Me?” The Jews answered Him, saying, “For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy, and because You, being a Man, ‘make Yourself God.”

“You, being a Man, make Yourself God.”.... The Pharisees did not acknowledge what He was saying about himself but they did understand whom Jesus claimed to be,... they rejected it.

This is not the first time they picked up stones (Jn.10). Previously in John 8:58-59 when Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM.” Then they took up stones to throw at Him.”

No wonder He later said to them, “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the one who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to them” (Matt 23:37).

Those who do not believe who He said He is, continue to pick up stones today though (not physically) because they cannot accept that Jesus said He was God in their own language and genre. They understood what He was claiming back then; today they ignore the Bible and do not understand His words.

Surely the same people who deny His deity when faced with His claims will try to kill him and His representatives. In the end they will be part of those armies who will fight this one who is coming back, the only God revealed in human flesh at the Battle of Meggido, (known as Armageddon). Jesus said- you are either for me or against me. Today you have that choice.

(From Let Us Reason)


1,438 posted on 09/17/2010 12:00:02 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1428 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
Your use of the words “preexist” and “before time started” - along with the LDS doctrine of premortal existence and polytheism suggests that, in LDS doctrine, there was a multiple entity existence before what you call the “creation” complete with cause>effect events – time before time, space before space, form before form. This would mean creation before creation.

The Mormon perspective is a little broader than that of the "Orthodox Christian". "Orthodox Christianity" does not really have a "what God was doing before he created the world" dogma, it simply says God is from everlasting to everlasting, and then there was this creation...

If that is a problem for you, I'm sorry, but I was striving to be as complete as possible while being brief (A challenge for most, more-so for me.)

Or perhaps your doctrine means only the physical creation when it speaks of “The Creation” - physical space/time - and views spiritual existence (beings, cultures, forms, etc.) in a separate, steady state (no beginning, no end, time without limitation.) In this view, Jesus Christ would be a creature in the spiritual realm and Creator to the physical realm. As a creature, He would be subordinate to the laws or properties or powers of the spiritual realm.

The Bible says "God is a Spirit..." (I get beat up with that all the time :-) So, is he subordinate to the laws of the spiritual realm? Jesus was mortal, was he subject to the laws of the mortal realm? I submit that being in a realm is not necessarily to be subordinate to it.

But both scenarios are irreconcilable with Creation ex nihilo wherein all things (not some or most) whether spiritual or physical, are created by and for Jesus Christ.

IF God exists, then "Ex Nihilo" is wrong for God existed, hence no Nihilo.

So, is God invisible because to see him is to Die, or is he "not visible"... And just how were we created in the image of a God with no image anyway? Jesus was in the "Express Image of God" how does that work if God has no image?

Mormons believe God has a form, feet for his footstool (the Earth), a mouth to speak, ears to hear, and a face that man can seek to be reconciled before.

To think that the children of God look nothing like him is to deny the type and pattern of the earth and the Bible.

The Names of God I AM and YHvH, He IS, declare to us that He is The Creator ex nihilo - that He is One God and that none are like Him. There was no one and no thing before Him. And there will be no one and no thing after Him. His Name is Alpha and Omega.

I submit that from your perspective... There is nothing before the earth, the Bible however speaks of angels and a war in heaven. Revelations 12 -- The war in heaven which is continued here on earth., Jeremiah 1:5
5 Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.
The Bible says we lived before we were born as spirits, we were the Sons and Daughters of God. God's people will know this stuff, Mormons do, "Orthodox Christianity" has lost that knowledge, even though it's in the Bible.

No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared [him]. - John 1:18

Acts of the apostles 7:55-56
55 But he, being full of the Holy Ghost, looked up stedfastly into heaven, and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing on the fright hand of God, 56 And said, Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God.
Houston, you have a problem... With the Trinity.

You know AG, I don't want to try to tear down your faith, I am content to let all men believe what they want, and not bother them. You came to me, you started asking me questions. Let's cut all the round about, I have a page here, I link to it a lot. I have a whole section on The oneness of God. Go read it before responding, please it'll save us both time.

As for Law of identity and the Law of excluded middle (A nice way of saying there is no compromise, IMHO) I don't see how laws of physics or logic apply to the Trinity... and I don't see my definitions violating any of these laws either.

Since we are already pretty high brow, can I bring in Multiverse Theory, and posit that God was not trying to explain that to people, nor was he trying to explain string theory to monks in the middle ages. God tells the truth, always, but sometimes he simplifies things just so we mere mortals can understand it.

I am not going to try to ruin your day, or your faith, but mine is well thought out, supported by the Bible and just as valid as anyone Else's faith in that regard.

Many antis on this forum would love to destroy my faith, ruin my day, cause me sleepless nights and make me doubt my savior. To them, all I can say is "I think we may accept it as a rule that whenever a person’s religious conversation dwells chiefly, or even frequently, on the faults of other people’s religions, he is in a bad condition." -- C.S. Lewis (Collected Letters Vol. 3 p. 209)

Good night, God bless and sweet dreams.

Delph
1,439 posted on 09/17/2010 1:39:10 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1363 | View Replies]

To: killermedic; Elsie; restornu
You don’t believe that Christ is the Son of God? Hmm and you say I am not Christian. Based on your question, Paul was wrong too. Keep swinging for the fence slugger!

Reading comprehension problems?

Not my problem.
1,440 posted on 09/17/2010 1:41:44 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1366 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,401-1,4201,421-1,4401,441-1,460 ... 1,761 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson