[wagglebee]

We've been through this kind of lying before. RC apologists can't argue from Scripture, so they rewrite other people's comments and then discuss those fictitious rewrites.

Let's recap for posterity.

Okay let's recap.

You just called me a liar. I'll let you in on a little secret, I'm GLAD you think I'm a liar because you and I don't share the same definition of truth and honesty. I don't want your respect. I don't want you to like me. What I want is for you to keep posting things the same way you always have.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

I trust if my posts break the rules they'll be deleted.

Roman Catholic apologists often rewrite other people's comments to say something that was never said or written.

There is no Scriptural support for Mary's continuing virginity after Christ was born; for her sinless life; for her bodily assumption into heaven; for her repeated reappearances on earth; for her "intact hymen after childbirth;" nor for her blasphemous titles of "co-mediator" and "co-redeemer."

Christ's virgin birth was documented in the Bible. It is true. Sadly, Christ's virgin birth is not sufficient for Rome. Rome requires magic to supplement the glorious supernatural truth of Christ's birth by a simple Jewish virgin and the Holy Spirit.

And magic lies.

"I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.

Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.

For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie.." -- Rev. 22:13-15