Replies

Most Protestants do not sing to or about or to a Goddess we leave that to others

It's when you go overboard like this that your side loses all credibility and looks like granny Clampett confronted with a pool table. The argument starts to take on the elements of a caricature that can't possibly be serious.

When one resorts to (and I couldn't make this up if I tried) "The Church of The Most High Goddess" to back up a case against the use of the word sibyl in a 13th century sequence... well even the blind could see that someone is reaching.

It's a metaphor, it's not rocket science. David stands for Israel, the sibyl stands for the gentiles. It raises the allusion that at the time of the Incarnation all the world was waiting for a savior, the pagans accepted Augustus as that savior and the Jews rejected Christ. It's called being evocative. Of course it also points out directly that everyone, Jew and Greek, knew how things were going to end.

You're really going to have to do better than running around in a spastic panic over the use of the word sibyl in a hymn. It's like walking into someone's house and having a nervous breakdown upon seeing a Christmas tree.

Meanwhile your idea of God contains four wills apparently but somehow the word "sibyl" is a problem. Persons act according to their nature, there is only one Divine nature possessed totally by each Person of the Blessed Trinity. "Will" (Volition) flows from nature, therefore there is ONE Divine Will, not three. So too does intellect, therefore there is only one Divine intellect.

If anyone does not confess properly and truly in accord with the holy Fathers that the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit are a Trinity in unity, and a unity in Trinity, that is, one God in three subsistences, consubstantial and of equal glory, one and the same Godhead, nature, substance, virtue, power, kingdom, authority, will, operation of the three, uncreated, without beginning, incomprehensible, immutable, creator and protector of all things, let him be condemned. (Lateran Council of 649, canon 1)

It's not like this is new...

Three years ago someone right here on freep posted this from Frank Sheed's Map of Life:

The Three Persons--the Father, the Son, the Holy Ghost--each possess the one Divine nature: they do not share it: they each possess it in its totality. It is important to grasp exactly what this means. Men, we say, have one nature, in the sense that they all are human and human nature is one thing. But though Brown and I are of one nature, I cannot think with Brown's mind nor love with Brown's will. I must think with my own mind and love with my own will. So that, although in a general sense human nature is one, in the concrete each man has his own nature and acts in it. With the Three Persons of the Trinity this is not so. There is but one Divine nature, one Divine mind, one Divine will. The three Persons each use the one mind to know with, the one will to love with. For there is but the one absolute Divine nature. Thus there are not three Gods, but one God. The Christian revelation cannot allow the faintest derogation from pure monotheism. The three Persons, then, are not separate. But they are distinct. The Father is God, the Son is God, the Holy Ghost is God. But the Father is not the Son, nor the Son the Holy Ghost, nor the Holy Ghost the Father.

Go nuts on that whole sibyl thing though since that's so much more important than having a totally heretical understanding of the God Whom one professes to worship.