Replies

It’s a pretty shameful website you’re using(http://www.miraclesceptic.com) to try and dig up dirt on Saint Pio

Here is what your research site has to say about Jesus..
http://www.miraclesceptic.com/conjurerjesus.html#_JESUS_THE_CONJURER

“The miracle of the loaves and fishes could have been done in the dark which makes trickery easier. In Luke 9 we read that the five thousand were fed in a desert or waste area and significantly near the city of Bethsaida. Jesus could have performed an illusion and had wealthy friends to pay for the food. “

http://www.miraclesceptic.com/sinlessnessmiracle.html

excert...Anyone could claim to be sinless and availing of the doctrine that God’s ways are strange, could say that her or his sins were not sins but were done for a good purpose. We all know people who seem impeccable and if Jesus’ goodness is evidence that he was of God then it means that they are of God as well and telling the truth if they say they are divine. Jesus did things that look evil like pulling his death on the cross on himself, risking the apostles lives by taking them around with him when he was a wanted man, insulting the woman whose daughter was possessed and I could go on for a year.

One believes in Pio because they have chosen to, not because there is any evidence that God has given in His word. It is faith in faith and nothing more ... There is not one thing in the word of God that says those He loves will have His wounds.. there is no "type" in the NT of that not even in the Co redeemer Mary.. The idea that they are "proof " of Gods love for him, or his holiness is made up out of whole cloth , God never said it or implied it..

It is not wise to attribute works to God that are works of men or satan ...