Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Further, the difference between RC apologists and Protestants on these threads is that RCs make up loony stuff and tag Protestants with believing it

We don't have to make anything up. Calvin wrote things that would have made Dr. Timothy Leary at the height of his LSD experimentations proud, and the 8 or 9 generations of Protestants that have come about after him have only improved on that original craziness.

while Protestants point to actual practices and rites and beliefs Roman Catholics hold and then demolish those errors by the truth of Scripture.

Just as Calvin got his salvational teachings backwards, so do the anti Catholics get their points backwards. How can somebody claim to have the truth of Scripture when most of Scripture is either ignored or reduced to out of context snippets? The WCF is a perfect case in point. Meaningless gibberish generated from the mind of a madman, utilizing snippets of the OT and out of context snippets of Paul, and calling it based on the Gospels, which are either wholly ignored or reduced to tertiary commentary, not primary proofs.

6,703 posted on 09/22/2010 10:12:36 AM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Caholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6691 | View Replies ]


To: MarkBsnr

As usual, your posts are filled with emtpy, sarcastic generalities.

Is it because you have no point other than to deride your Scriptural opposition with name-calling?


6,707 posted on 09/22/2010 11:00:58 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6703 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson