Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Eckleburg; NYer; Salvation; Pyro7480; Coleus; narses; annalex; Campion; don-o; Mrs. Don-o; ...
So sorry not to answer according to your desires. Let’s try again.

Actually, you didn't answer at all. I half suspect you cut and pasted a canned response.

Who believes 2 + 2 + 7?

I posed a hypothetical to illustrate a point, did it confuse you somehow?

6,448 posted on 09/20/2010 1:48:41 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6439 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee
I posed a hypothetical to illustrate a point, did it confuse you somehow?

I was sure the answer was "B" but based on the response it may very well be "A". It would explain a lot.

6,449 posted on 09/20/2010 1:50:31 PM PDT by conservonator (How many times? 70 x 7!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6448 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Your hypothetical is based on fallacy, so try again.


6,480 posted on 09/20/2010 2:38:42 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6448 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson