To: Mad Dawg; Natural Law; Cronos; wagglebee
Sorry—you are probably wondering why I pinged you to that post to Old Reggie.
I sent t off without remembering that I was intending to ask if any of you can tell me if I am way off base when I posted that I believed that Jesus didn’t “still have much to learn” , because in the Divine Trinity He is omniscient, but rather that He had much to EXPERIENCE.
Thus the meaning of the Cross.
Please let me know if I am wrong.
5,344 posted on
09/15/2010 6:30:57 PM PDT by
Running On Empty
((The three sorriest words: "It's too late"))
To: Running On Empty
I don't think anyone has or can get that all right. I don't know if you're wrong or if you're right. I really don't. I llike the formulation of knowing but needing experience.
But what we're talking about is the subjective experience of Jesus. I decided to quit trying that about 5 minutes after they started in seminary. I am content to let that one abide in mystery.
5,400 posted on
09/15/2010 8:32:46 PM PDT by
Mad Dawg
(Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
To: Running On Empty; Mad Dawg; Natural Law; Cronos; wagglebee
I sent t off without remembering that I was intending to ask if any of you can tell me if I am way off base when I posted that I believed that Jesus didn’t “still have much to learn” , because in the Divine Trinity He is omniscient, but rather that He had much to EXPERIENCE. Yes, He studied and learned.
Luke 2:52 And Jesus increased in wisdom and in stature, and in favor with God and man.
5,576 posted on
09/16/2010 9:10:35 AM PDT by
OLD REGGIE
(I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson