They’re fairly uniformly wrong. There are things taught us former Catholics as doctrine, which seem to have crossed diocesan lines.
How geographically separate diocese can all teach the same errors is beyond me. The chances for that would be astronomical.
That tells me that that’s what the Catholic church really teaches regardless of what someone posts is the *official* position of the Vatican.
Oh, I agree with that aspect being uniformly wrong.
As in . . . all as wrong . . . and even somewhat uniformly on particulars.
I just don’t think there’s a GREAT deal of homogeneous uniformity in THE INSTITUTION—even in the Catechism.
THE LOS ANGELES RELIGIOUS EDUCATION CONGRESS
That's the how... the "why" is something called "Nouvelle Théologie" The wiki article is facepalm city.
The theologians usually associated with Nouvelle Théologie are Henri de Lubac, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Hans Urs von Balthasar, Yves Congar, Karl Rahner, Hans Küng, Edward Schillebeeckx, Marie-Dominique Chenu, Louis Bouyer, Étienne Gilson, Jean Daniélou, Jean Mouroux and Joseph Ratzinger (now, Pope Benedict XVI).
Well lovely...