Replies

The post could be correctly read either way. It wasn’t a false accusation, until the author clarified it.

Not really. It could have been worded better, but if someone had bothered to read it carefully, the plain meaning would have been understood.

But nobody even thought to ask for a clarification. They just took off with it and ran with it, backslapping and high fiving each other over it as if it were written in stone, not to mention that they then proceeded to paint ALL Protestants with the the same broad brush.

And to top it off, close to a hundred posts were made clarifying Quix's (and others) position and only ONE Catholic even took his side. The rest of the RC crowd fell silent and dropped the issue without the least acknowledgment that they were wrong, not only in their interpretation but in their negligence for not making sure of the truth of what they were broadcasting BEFORE spreading the lie.

the plain meaning would have been understood.

I believe that they are part and parcel of the Biblical END TIMES GREAT DECEPTION BECAUSE they will be extremely persuasive about “creating man,” bioengineering all the religious greats of history—FOR SOCIAL ENGINEERING PURPOSES—including Jesus—performing miracles through their technologies—and purportedly having very convincing 3D holographic “histories” “proving” such.
I believe that they are part and parcel of the Biblical END TIMES GREAT DECEPTION BECAUSE they will be [in the future] extremely persuasive about “creating man,”[in the past] bioengineering all the religious greats of history—FOR SOCIAL ENGINEERING PURPOSES—including Jesus—performing miracles through their technologies—and purportedly having very convincing 3D holographic “histories” “proving” such.
The critters have already claimed to government officials that THEY DID [PAST TENSE--AS IN BEFORE THE PRESENT--AS IN, THE PAST--LIKE HUNDREDS AND THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO! HELLO?! SHEESH] BIOENGINEER--IN THE PAST ALL THE RELIGIOUS LEADERS OF HISTORY INCLUDING JESUS FOR SOCIAL ENGINEERING PURPOSES. GET IT RIGHT WHEN YOU QUOTE ME OR FORGET IT.

Even leaving off the colored fonts, there is precious little plain meaning in this, the rest of the post or many of the following posts by the same author.

I agree going off without clarification was wrong, if you agree that clarification is still whacko and only slightly less garbled.

They just took off with it and ran with it, backslapping and high fiving each other over it as if it were written in stone, not to mention that they then proceeded to paint ALL Protestants with the the same broad brush.

I think it's Gamecock who has a catalog of when we Catholics started the trash-talking. Who knows, maybe it's a representative sample, maybe not. I don't think we'll ever get to the bottom of who started it.

Maybe we can acknowledge that and, while being patient with one another, can agree that the real problem is who's going to stop it.