Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Eckleburg; NYer; Salvation; Pyro7480; Coleus; narses; annalex; Campion; don-o; Mrs. Don-o; ...
I wrote:

So I will ask yet again, can you name a reputable group with verifiable methods that suggests there is a significantly lower number of Catholics?

To which you responded:

As I said, google pulls up a variety of numbers.

This WikiAnswers gives two estimates -- "986 million" and "over one billion."

Now, if you will refer back to my post, you will see that I asked for a REPUTABLE group with VERIFIABLE methods, your WikiAnswers were provided by ID1152302961 and That--Girl and under no circumstances would an intelligent person consider anonymous WikiAnswers contributors to be reputable or their methods verifiable (now, they may both actually be reputable and their methods verifiable, but this is impossible to conclude without any documentation).

Nevertheless, if we look and see when ID1152302961's answer of "over one billion" was given, we will see that it was on February 29, 2008 and this was more than two years before the latest estimates of membership in the Catholic Church was given. We then see That--Girl's edit of 986 million was on February 20, 2009 and still over a year before the latest estimates were released. Based on the estimates prior to those given in 2010, the membership of the Catholic church WAS around one billion; however, it is also important to realize that only about 98% of Catholics are of the Latin Rite, so there are fully 20 million Eastern Rite Catholics who WOULD NOT be considered Roman Catholic.

So, your "experts" at WikiAnswers have actually done nothing to satisfy your claim that there are a "variety of numbers" because the dates and context given are important.

One important reason why the numbers are all over the map is because Rome inflates the numbers of its members by including all those millions of men and women who have fled Rome for a faith founded on Scripture.

You've made this claim numerous times, but you have yet to actually document its validity. Do you believe that something becomes true if you repeat it enough?

While they are no longer Roman Catholics, Rome still counts them in their inaccurate tallies.

Actually, and this has been explained to you many times, the Catholic Church DOES NOT consider those who have formally left the Church to be Catholic.

I wrote:

It is generally understood that omniscience is required to know for a certainty the truth of what is in another person's heart.

To which you responded:

So not only have you broken the rules by falsely saying I believe myself to be "omniscient," but you now imply I think I know your heart.

Actually, I've said nothing of the sort, I pointed out a general understanding, I'm not responsible for any inferences you may draw from it.

However, the hearts of Roman Catholics are murky, at best.

Please tell us how you really feel, don't hold back.

4,144 posted on 09/13/2010 5:39:20 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3941 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee; metmom; 1000 silverlings; Quix; OLD REGGIE; wmfights
the Catholic Church DOES NOT consider those who have formally left the Church to be Catholic.

To borrow a phrase of yours -- "this has been explained to you many times."

The Roman Catholic church only considers a person to have "formally left" the Roman Catholic church when that person writes a letter to his bishop advising Rome of that fact.

I've asked dozens of ex-Roman Catholics and many other ex-RCs on Free Republic if they've done that and they just laughed.

Apparently, when they find a church that follows the Scriptures they shake the dust of Rome from their feet and they don't look back.

God be praised.

And we can't forget we have the testimony of Roman Catholics like Salvation who have repeatedly told us that "once baptized a (Roman) Catholic, always a (Roman) Catholic."

Is Salvation wrong? Has she been "poorly catechized?"

DR. E: So not only have you broken the rules by falsely saying I believe myself to be "omniscient," but you now imply I think I know your heart.

WAGGLEBEE: Actually, I've said nothing of the sort

Do RCs think we forget some of these personally slanderous posts by RCs which repeatedly break the FR RF rules? I realize RCs don't trust the written word, but thankfully, it remains to reveal the errors of RC apologists.

In YOUR POST #3533 you wrote...

"...a person such as yourself who claims omniscience..."

Thank you for the fine illustration of the veracity of those who follow another gospel taught by "another Christ."

4,234 posted on 09/13/2010 12:22:58 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson