Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad Dawg
Of course there is no explicit development of what happens in the Eucharist in the Bible. God wanted to make sure that theologians of later centuries could get work, so he left stuff for them to dope out.

I'm tired. That's the best I can do for right now.

I'm afraid that's a pretty lame "explanation".

Of course, we have only the words of Jesus clearly and specifically. What weight does that have compared to later day invented "tradition"?

3,863 posted on 09/11/2010 2:32:29 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3857 | View Replies ]


To: OLD REGGIE
I note there is no answer to the question about what exactly the "this" was, in DO this in memory of me?

What weight does that have compared to later day invented "tradition"?

Doesn't that depend on who "invented" the "tradition"?

3,873 posted on 09/11/2010 4:22:04 PM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3863 | View Replies ]

To: OLD REGGIE
Of course, we have only the words of Jesus clearly and specifically. What weight does that have compared to later day invented "tradition"?

Don't you have that backwards? We have the words of Jesus only because the Church preserved them and passed them along with the rest of tradition (including the NT). The Church and the practice of the Eucharist predate the NT.

3,877 posted on 09/11/2010 4:27:55 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3863 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson